![]() However that this two chapters' style seem consistent with the rest of Book of Pleasure, they are the only places that Spare has proposed questionable materials. ![]() And also "By knowledge of the first letter, one is familiar with the whole alphabet" by which the curiosity arises and one may immediately asks "why 22 and why Spare's first letter of sacred alphabet should necessarily have the qualities of Aleph". among Book of Pleasure, Focus of Life and Anathema of Zos you will never find any at least direct reference to specific paradigms except to his own teachings of course in Earth Inferno there exist references to Khayyam and Dante but not in his latter writings.īeside this in the little chapter "Note on Sacred Letters" there is a sentence which associates the number of sacred letters to the number 22. Because Spare has a very special approach for "never" mentioning any paradigm or ideas of a specific school of magic in his texts. In this chapter Spare has written on a subject specially dedicated to "Egyptians tradition". About the chapters I mentioned at my first post, there is one weird thing about the chapter "Symbolism".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |